Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a 19th century German philosopher who devised a particular dialectic, or, method of argument for resolving disagreements.
Now, in the 21st century, Hegelian-Marxist thinking affects our entire social and political structure.
The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we Hegelian dialect not know how we are helping to implement the vision.
When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects and transient verbscovert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic.
This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought. When we understand what motivated Hegel, we can see his influence on all of our destinies. Hegelian conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the United Nations to the major American political parties, all the way down to local school boards and community councils.
Dialogues and consensus-building are primary tools of the dialectic, and terror and intimidation are also acceptable formats for obtaining the goal. The ultimate Third Way agenda is world government. Today the dialectic is active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can see it in environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property owners, in democrats against republicans, in greens against libertarians, in communists against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus pro-life, in Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists, in peace activists against war hawks.
No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and the resolution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts. Although Hegel refers to "the two elemental considerations: This was due partly to the rediscovery and reevaluation of him as the philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists, partly through a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything, and partly through increasing recognition of the importance of his dialectical method.
A thesis versus B anti-thesis equals C synthesis.
If A my idea of freedom conflicts with B your idea of freedom then C neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave. The Soviet Union was based on the Hegelian dialectic, as is all Marxist writing. They merely changed the dialectical language to fit into the modern version of Marxist thinking called communitarianism.
A Model Potemkin Village. How is it possible to consider a Hegelian argument? If the ideas, interpretations of experiences, and the sources are all wrong, can a conclusion based on all these wrong premises be sound? The answer is no. Two false premises do not make a sound conclusion even if the argument follows the formula.
Three, four, five, or six false premises do not all combine to make a conclusion sound. You must have at least one sound premise to reach a sound conclusion.
Logical mathematical formulas are only the basis for deductive reasoning. Equally important is knowledge of semantics, or considering the meanings of the words used in the argument.
Just because an argument fits the formula, it does not necessarily make the conclusion sound. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel knew this when he designed his dialectic.
Hegel is an imperialist con artist who established the principles of dialectical "no-reason. National governments represent people who are free from imperial controls over private property, trade and production. Twisted logic is why cons are so successful, and Hegel twisted it in such a way as to be "impenetrable.
The fallacy is in the language, not in the math. Hegel was an idealist who believed that the highest state of mankind can only be attained through constant ideological conflict and resolution.
The rules of the dialectic means mankind can only reach its highest spiritual consciousness through endless self-perpetuating struggle between ideals, and the eventual synthesizing of all opposites. But in the final analysis, this ideology simply justifies conflict and endless war. It is also the reasoning behind using military power to export an illogical version of freedom and false democratic ideals.
No matter how many new words they make up to define it, or how many new theories they come up with to give it validity, we can prove beyond a doubt that it is all false. The Hegelian dialectic is the ridiculous idea that constant conflict and continual merging of opposite ideologies, as established by extreme right or left belief systems, will lead spiritual mankind into final perfection.
But like the AA definition of insanity, the world keeps trying it over and over expecting different results. And when Amitai Etzioni used Hegelian reasoning to base the Communitarian Network on a "balance" between A Rights and B Responsibilities, he built the entire theory of C communitarianism on nothing but disproven and unprovable unscientific theoriesMembers of a Hegelian State are happy even to sacrifice their lives for the State.
Heraclitus [ edit ] According to Hegel, " Heraclitus is the one who first declared the nature of the infinite and first grasped nature as in itself infinite, that is, its essence as process. Hegelian dialectic n (Philosophy) philosophy an interpretive method in which the contradiction between a proposition (thesis) and its antithesis is resolved at a higher level of truth (synthesis) Hege′lian dialec′tic n.
an interpretive method in which some assertible proposition (thesis) is necessarily opposed by an equally assertible and apparently. “Hegel’s dialectics” refers to the particular dialectical method of argument employed by he said, follow one another “in the way in which, to use a Hegelian image from the preface, bud, blossom and fruit succeed each other Pinkard, Terry, , Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of a Possibility, Philadelphia: Temple.
Hegelian thinking affects our entire social and political structure. The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution.
If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to [ ]. Hegelian dialectic definition, an interpretive method, originally used to relate specific entities or events to the absolute idea, in which some assertible proposition (thesis) is necessarily opposed by an equally assertible and apparently contradictory proposition (antithesis), the mutual contradiction being reconciled on a higher level of truth by a third proposition (synthesis).
The Hegelian Dialectic is, in short, the critical process by which the ruling elite create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus conditioning the people that a change is needed.